

The MITLL3 DEFECTS
The information provided here is based on John Barton's MITLL3 Test
Summary report of 21 October 1998. A complete copy of that report is available
here.
- Hot pixels cause saturated columns and weaker vertical trails in
bias frames. In long dark frames weaker hot pixels may also saturate pixels
locally about the hot pixel site, faint hot pixels become more prominant
and some that are undetectable at short integration become prominent.
A defect map may be needed to assist observers in the placement of their
obejects.
- The trailed charge from hot pixels can appear to start up unexpectedly
in windowed images when the hot pixel is not contained within the window.
The trailed charge is, however, in the expected column containing the hot
pixel and is of the expected intensity.
TRAPPING SITES
A quick look for trapping sites has revealed only a small number
of obvious traps. The co-ordinates given are with respect to the first pixel
out (of output amplifier A) being pixel (1, 1). Those with unknown Y co-ordinates
have been detected only by their trailed charge into the Y overscan region.
- ( 472, 488) consuming about 160 e-
- ( 726, 1064) 250
- ( 766, 240) 2000
- (1032, ????)
- (1272, ????)
- (1441, ????)
- (1952, ????)
- (1956, ????)
There are probably many smaller traps that have remained undetected.
These may become prominent in charge shuffling readouts.
HOT PIXEL DEFECTS
In the following defect lists the co-ordinates are with respect to
the first pixel out of AMP-A being pixel (1, 1). Charge intensities apply
to NORMAL readout mode and a CCD operating temperature of 160K. Intensities
will be different at other readout rates and temperatures.
- BRIGHT DEFECTS LIST
- See the appendix to the MITLL3 Test Summary
report for a more complete description of defects found earlier in the
CCD setup, some of which have since changed but may return.
Several
CCD columns show trailed charge on bias and dark frames due to the presence
of hot pixels. The trails are brightened columns that follow the defect site
in the readout. They follow after the defect site because the slower readout
allows sufficient time for the defect to deposit charge in the column pixels
as these pixels are shifted through the defect site. For all but the major
defect there is insufficient time to accumulate a measurable charge in pixels
ahead of the defect site as each column pixel is swept rapidly through the
defect site during the fast cleanout process. Only the major defect is
sufficiently intense to deposit a measurable charge ahead of the defect
site.
The following CCD columns trail charge on bias and dark frames
due to hot pixels at the locations indicated. The intensity measurements
(e-/pix) apply only for a NORMAL speed readout and the CCD operated at 160K.
Column
- 168 due to hot pixel at ( 168, 3473) .... NOT SEEN LATELY
- 239 due to hot pixel at ( 239, 4096/7) trails 12 e-/pix
- 349 due to hot pixel at ( 349, 3920/1) trails 4 e-/pix
- 733/4 rejected columns due to a major defect at (733/4, 3821) trails
- 240 and 280 e-/pix in columns 733/4
- 1050/1 due to hot pixel at (1050/1,1219) trails 1 and 3 e-/pix
- 1091 due to hot pixel at (1091,1255/6) trails 3 e-/pix
- 1138-51 including rejected columns affected by the MAJOR DEFECT centred
at (1144,1228) - see below for intensities
- 1157/8 due to hot pixel at (1157/8,1233) trails 12 and 3 e-/pix
- 1213/4 due to hot pixel at (1213/4, 437) trails 3 and 2 e-/pix
- 1298 due to hot pixel at (1298,1505/6) trails 4 e-/pix
- 1316/7/8 including rejected column due to hot pixel at (1317, 155) trails
1, 80 and 3 e-/pix
- 1497 rejected column affected by the major defect at (1497, 3477)
trails 550 e-/pix
- 1922/3 due to hot pixel at (1922/3, 1893) trails 6 e-/pix just beyond
the defect but trails fade to zero over last columns read out
- 2048 rejected column due to some sort of intermittent edge effect
-
- HOT PIXEL DEFECTS FOUND IN 2000 SECOND DARK FRAMES
- Peak search routines were used to detect and list hot pixels and cosmic
ray events in 2000 sec dark frames at a CCD temperature of 160K. The routine
rejected known defective columns from inclusion in these lists. Columns 733,
734, 1143, 1144, 1145, 1146, 1317, 1497 and 2048 were completely rejected
from the listing owing to severe defects at (733/4, 3821), (1144,1228), (1317,
155), (1497, 3477) and an erratic last column 2048. Processing several such
repeated dark frames, enabled a table of repeating defects to be
compiled.
In the following table defect co-ordinates are based on
(1, 1) being the first pixel read out of the CCD's AMP-A. The
Intensity is the defect's intensity, measured in ADUs (gain
1.75 e-/pix) above the
bias level. The Count is the number of dark frames displaying
the defect. Thus, cnt = 4 indicates that the defect was found on all four
dark frames whereas a cnt = 2 indicates it appeared on only two frames and
may therefor be a remnant of a cosmic ray event or perhaps a pixel a little
distant from an erratic hot pixel.
| (X,Y)
| Intensity
| Count
| (X,Y)
| Intensity
| Count
|
|---|
| ( 209, 127)
| 112
| 4
| (1316, 154)
| 65132
| 2
|
| (1295, 178)
| 11625
| 4
| ( 599, 278)
| 316
| 4
|
| ( 517, 315)
| 198
| 4
| ( 604, 369)
| 422
| 4
|
| (1082, 401)
| 31
| 3
| (1213, 437)
| 23267
| 4
|
| (1956, 517)
| 6884
| 4
| (1952, 519)
| 986
| 4
|
| (1335, 553)
| 534
| 4
| (1553, 582)
| 191
| 3
|
| ( 823, 638)
| 946
| 2
| ( 607, 699)
| 669
| 2
|
| ( 811, 778)
| 533
| 4
| (1580, 807)
| 143
| 4
|
| ( 191, 821)
| 29
| 4
| ( 835, 938)
| 199
| 4
|
| (1165,1054)
| 215
| 4
| ( 982,1130)
| 1152
| 4
|
| (1105,1145)
| 97
| 4
| (1933,1171)
| 5555
| 4
|
| (1131,1176)
| 38
| 4
| ( 754,1193)
| 2287
| 4
|
| (1027,1204)
| 135
| 4
| (1100,1205)
| 3328
| 4
|
| ( 957,1210)
| 91
| 2
| ( 956,1210)
| 100
| 2
|
| ( 786,1211)
| 24
| 3
| (1051,1218)
| 31956
| 4
|
| ( 969,1220)
| 391
| 4
| ( 952,1225)
| 1605
| 4
|
| (1147,1232)
| 67
| 2
| (1157,1232)
| 65138
| 4
|
| (1086,1234)
| 544
| 4
| (1154,1237)
| 153
| 4
|
| (1112,1244)
| 151
| 4
| (1043,1249)
| 49
| 3
|
| (1136,1251)
| 21
| 4
| ( 47,1252)
| 25
| 2
|
| (1122,1253)
| 55
| 4
| (1013,1255)
| 95
| 4
|
| (1091,1255)
| 24382
| 4
| (1050,1299)
| 256
| 4
|
| ( 253,1349)
| 235
| 4
| ( 857,1353)
| 148
| 2
|
| ( 871,1353)
| 104
| 4
| ( 857,1354)
| 96
| 2
|
| ( 802,1370)
| 222
| 4
| ( 807,1387)
| 610
| 4
|
| ( 242,1405)
| 36
| 4
| (1860,1474)
| 5392
| 2
|
| (1562,1490)
| 203
| 4
| (1298,1503)
| 65138
| 2
|
| (1298,1504)
| 65138
| 2
| (1298,1507)
| 65132
| 2
|
| (1390,1521)
| 26
| 3
| (1913,1599)
| 307
| 4
|
| (1923,1893)
| 5317
| 4
| ( 710,2238)
| 1157
| 4
|
| ( 391,2289)
| 998
| 4
| (1699,2351)
| 450
| 3
|
| ( 688,2572)
| 530
| 4
| ( 683,2630)
| 1559
| 2
|
| (1591,2813)
| 26
| 4
| (1272,2957)
| 5121
| 4
|
| ( 268,3051)
| 130
| 4
| (1599,3143)
| 598
| 4
|
| (1309,3239)
| 40
| 4
| ( 965,3293)
| 2475
| 4
|
| (1842,3345)
| 102
| 4
| (2008,3432)
| 6581
| 4
|
| ( 168,3472)
| 2595
| 4
| ( 749,3614)
| 99
| 4
|
| (1441,3624)
| 2962
| 4
| (1441,3628)
| 96
| 4
|
| (1441,3632)
| 40
| 4
| (1032,3678)
| 245
| 4
|
| ( 732,3820)
| 65132
| 4
| ( 736,3821)
| 3063
| 4
|
| ( 349,3920)
| 11740
| 4
| (1123,3951)
| 680
| 3
|
| ( 239,4096)
| 65138
| 4
|
Chris Tinney, AAT Scheduler/MITLL Project Scientist
cgt@aaoepp.aao.gov.au
June 1998