Contents
- The Device
- Use with AAO
Instruments
- UCLES
- UHRF
- Others (including
decommissioned instruments like Taurus & RGO)
- A historical Serial Link / NONASTRO speed
problem
This page contains information on
the AAO's science grade deep depletion
2Kx4K device from MIT/LL/UH consortium - hereafter MITLL3. It was
first commissioned on the AAT in Oct 1998. The information
provided
is based on tests made in at the Epping Lab by John Barton (a copy of
his
comprehensive report can be found
here),
observations made at the AAT with LDSS and the RGO spectrograph by
C.Tinney and K.Glazebrook, and experience with MITLL3 use on UCLES/UHRF.
1.The Device
- Identity & Format
- This is device W67c2
(chip 2 from wafer 67) of the CCID-20 format run fabricated at
MIT/Lincoln
Labs and packed on an AlN substrate by GL Scientific. It is a 2K x 4K
edge
buttable device with 15 um pixels. The wafer used was a high
resistivity,
or deep depletion, one. The pixels are 40um thick.
The pixels on the MITLL3 are read out flipped in X (where
X is defined
as the X-direction as seen on AAO XMEM images and FITS files) relative
to the MITLL2.
Binning
Binning in both the vertical or
horizontal directions
with the MITLL3
is impossible.<>
Quantum Efficiency
The SiO AR coating used on this
device is optimised for red
performance.
This, together with its thickness, produces an enhanced quantum
efficiency
longwards of 6000A. The quantum efficiency results shown for the MITLL3
below were obtained in the Epping lab, with the device being operated
in
diode mode. The MITLL2 results were mesaured using an earlier set of
photodiodes
which had gone out of calibration. However, by measuring the MITLL3 QE
with both old and new photo-diodes, we have corrected the MITLL2
numbers.
These MITLL2 numbers are to be used in preference to previous MITLL2
curves.<>
 |
|
NB: because the Postscript file was created by an Evil
Empire Microsoft product, it will not preview with
Ghostview version 1.5 or earlier. It will preview with Ghostscript
version 4 or later, and it will print out.
|
- Longward of 5000A the MITLL3 has QE as better than, the TEK
1K. The same
wavelength for the MITLL2 is 4500A
- Fringing
- Because the detecting layer is so thick this device has
generally lower
fringing than most thinned CCDs, while retaining excellent red
sensitivity.
The extent of fringing was explored using the MITLL3 on the 25cm camera
of the RGO spectrograph with a 600R grating in October 1998. The
following
image shows a flatfield in the wavelength range 6400-9500A normalised
for
the flat-field lamp's spectral response. (Click on the image to see a
larger
version. Note that this image is just the 330x3200 pixel region
illuminated
by the RGO, and has been rotated and had its x-axis reversed in order
to
put it in the "conventional" spectral orientation).
- These results show fringing on two seperate length scales :
a large scale
effect on scales of hundreds of pixels with 5% p-p amplitude at 9500A,
and a small-scale effect on scales of 20 pixels (or 20A in wavelength)
with 5% p-p amplitude at 9500A. This can be seen more clearly in the
following
cut through the above image made at Y=200-210 pixels. We see
±1.5%
p-p at 8500A, ±4% at 9000A and ±5% at 9500A. This is
about
half the fringing seen in the MITLL2, which is itself significantly
less
than the fringing seen in the TEK.
- The main result is that fringing is (1) negligible below
8000A, and (2)
even above 8000A it is quite small.
- Cosmetics
- The device has a number of hot pixels, and one serious
bright defect. The
serious bright defect does not affect RGO observing, as it lies right
at
one edge of the RGO slit. When observing with Taurus or LDSS it will
cause
the loss of several columns. With UCLES, appropriate set-ups can place
it between, rather than on, an order.
- The remaining hot pixels cause vertical trails in bias
frames. In long
dark frames several weaker hot pixels appear and become more prominent.
The following images show bias and dark frames acquired approximately 9
hours after the CCD had been powered on.
- The device shows a small number of trapping sites. The
currently known
locations of both bright defects and trapping sites are listed here.
- The flat field cosmetics appear to be good with a
"brick-wall" considerably
reduced over that seen in the MITLL2. Currently we have no instrument
which
can actually illuminate thr entire CCD. However, an image of the
330x4096
region (X=805-1135, Y=1-4096) illuminated by the RGO can be found here
in FITS and FIGARO
format.
These images are spectrally normalised flat-fields, and should not be
trusted
in the top and bottom 400 pixels where the RGO is heavily vignetted.
The device does show regular horizontal changes in QE of
about 0.5%
at a spacing of about 70 pixels. Many of the hot pixels can also be
seen
as defects in the Si in flat fields, as in the following pair of images
from the X=805-1135, Y=1050-1350 region.
 |
 |
| Dark frame showing hot pixels. |
Flat field showing Si defects |
Cosmic Rays
- Because of the thickness of this device it seems to be very
susceptible
to cosmis rays. The observed hit rate for the entire detector is ~
830/1000s.
A particular point to note is that the cosmic rays are often seen to be
quite extended. One hundred pixels is not uncommon. Moreover, cosmic
rays
are obviously interacting with the Si in this CCD to produce both
curved
trails and even small showers.
- Focus
- The MITLL3 detector sits in a standard AAO dewar, and will
mount on all
the AAO instruments - however it has a preferred orientation because it
is rectangular. This means, for example, that on the RGO it has to be
mounted
rotated relative to the TEK.
In general its focus will be different from
the MITLL2 and the TEK for each instrument.
Performance
- Modifications have been made to the AAO's existing
controllers to take
advantage of the superb read-noise performance of these LL devices.
This
has allowed a device 8 time larger than our TEK1K to be read in about
twice
the time with similar or better noise performance. In general the
read-noise
performance is identical to that of the MITLL2
| SPEED |
INT
(us) |
GAIN
(e-/adu) |
READNOISE
(e-) |
ALPHA |
SAT
(Ke-) |
READ
RATE
(us/pix) |
FULL CHIP
READ TIME
(s) |
| FAST |
2+2 |
2.2 |
2.9 |
-0.15 |
148 |
10.5 |
108 |
| NORMAL |
4+4 |
1.1 |
2.0 |
0.24 |
62 |
18 |
143 |
| SLOW |
12+12 |
0.36 |
1.6 |
0.15 |
23 |
34 |
285 |
| XTRASLOW |
48+48 |
0.088 |
1.3 |
0.03 |
6 |
106 |
924 |
NONASTRO
|
1+1
|
4.7
|
5.2
|
-0.63
|
6.5
|
58
|
|
- Note that linearity corrections will need to be applied to
all data. Though
these are large for an optical detector, they are small compared to
those
seen in IR devices. After linearity correction, data taken in the
NORMAL,FAST
and XTRASLOW speed are linear to better than 0.1% over the full dynamic
range.
DARK CURRENT-
A 160K operating temperature has been adopted. At 160K the dark current
is small - a 2000 sec dark shows it was less than 0.4e-/pix/2000sec,
once
the CCD has been powered on for a day. However, the detector
takes
several days to reach this low a dark current level, due to a slow CCD
cleanout rate. The CCD cleanout rate following power off and on, with a
cold CCD, as measured in dark frames are:
|
Time after Power on
|
Intensity
(e/pix/2000s)
|
|
5
|
50
|
|
10
|
24
|
|
45
|
6.0
|
|
2 hours
|
4.2
|
|
8 hours
|
1.1
|
|
24 hours
|
0.66
|
|
2-3 days
|
0.3 to 0.4
|
- A further complication is that (at least for the MITLL2)
the dark current
levels observed when tested in Epping have not bee replicated on the
telescope.
This results in some serious scheduling implications for UHRF
observers,
and UCLES observers of faint targets for the MITLL2 and MITLL3. UCLES
observers
of faint targets with MITLL3 are strongly urged to read the following report
on MITLL2 dark currents.
RESIDUAL IMAGES-
There are no signs of residuals in 300s dark frames taken directly
after
pinhole exposures of 350 times chip saturation, i.e. at 50Me-/pix.
CLOCK INDUCED DARK CURRENTS-
Are too week to be detected without binning, and since binning is not
possible,
can be ignored.
SATURATION STRIPES-
Saturation stripes in the row direction across bright saturating
pinhole
images used to simulate bright point sources have not been detected. No
bar patterns or regions of depressed or raised bias level were seen
when
the local spot was overexposed to 50Me-/pix.
2. MITLL3 on
AAO Instruments
2.1 UCLES
Contact the
UCLES
Instrument Scientist.
The MITLL3 device has been commissioned with UCLES, and gives smaller
pixels
(15um) than the TEK, improving spectral and spatial resolution, a
somewhat
increased wavelength coverage, and complete sampling (with no
inter-order
gaps) much further into the red. Users should be aware that MITLL3
images
are flipped laterally compared with MITLL2, i.e. lower order numbers
are
to the right, but wavelength still increases from top to bottom of each
order.
By judicious adjustment of the
cross disperser grating angle ECH_GAMMA,
it is possible for the most part to position the worst of the hot
columns
in or near an inter-order gap, even with the 31.6 l/mm grating. The
inability
to bin MITLL3 data on-chip is only a minor concern, but observers are
reminded
to enter the command "DATA USHORT" after running up the CCD system in
order
to keep the file sizes manageable. For example, each image taken with
the
MITLL_PLANET window (2048 data columns + 40 overscan columns x 2496
rows)
is 20 Mb in size.
The fringing numbers found with the
RGO (amplitude of ±1.5% p-p
at 8500A, ±4% at 9000A and ±7% at 10000) can be
expected
to produce similar effects with UCLES.
UCLES observers of faint targets
are strongly urged to read the following report
on MITLL2 dark currents.
An important point to note
is that the current UCLES camera optics
cannot illuminate the entire area of the LL detector (which is 60 x
30mm
in size). In fact the unvignetted region which can be observed is more
like 38.5 x 18.8 mm (for less than 10% vignetting). The region covered
at 50% vignetting is 60 x 34 mm, which is approximately the entire LL
chip,
however unless you are working in the very red, the echellogram will
not
put any light on much of the chip.
The following sample GIF
images from ECHWIND the region of the
LL chip illuminated and the effects of vignetting.


Suitable
windows should therefore enable the read time to be cut by a factor of
2 over the 'full chip' times given above. (If the fact that we
can't
actually illuminate the whole chip seems insane to you, then I suggest
you contact your ACIAAT representative and start lobbying for the UCLES
Camera upgrade as soon as possible!)
Note of course that the 'boxes'
shown are for one wavelength set-up.
You can move the echellogram anywhere on this field - but the relative
locations of the boxes will stay the same. As with Taurus, the main
reason
for preferring the TEK over the LL device is its superior QE in the
blue.
2.2 UHRF
Because it cannot be binned, the
MITLL3 is of very little use for UHRF
observers.
A further complication is that the
dark current
levels observed when tested in Epping have not bee replicated on the
telescope.
This results in some serious scheduling implications for UHRF
observers.
It has not yet been verified, but it seems extremely likely that the
same
is true for the MITLL3. See the following report
on
MITLL2 dark currents.
2.3 Other Instruments
The use of the LL Enginerring CCD on other instruments will be
attempted
if required by observers on a shared risks basis.
Taurus
MITLL3 has been used with
Taurus in the past. Taurus is now decommissioned for use on the AAT.
This information is provided for historical completeness only.
Contact Joss Hawthorn (
jbh@aaoepp.aao.gov.au)
The MITLL2 device has been
comissioned on Taurus, though as of Oct 26
the MITLL3 has not yet been used. There is expected to be no problem
with
its use, however. The MIT/LL devices are excellent device from the
point
of view of sampling.
| Field Sampling with Taurus II |
|
f/8 |
f/15 |
| TEK |
0.594"/pix |
0.315"/pix |
| MIT-LL Eng |
0.37"/pix |
0.20"/pix |
The TTF at f/8 now gives 0.37"/pix over the full 9.87' field and in 1"
seeing, this areal advantage is really paying off for the wide field
surveys.
There is not much need for f/15 now, and observers who do wish to use
f/15
with the LL chips should think carefully about why they want to. Also
the
detector allows the full 10' diameter field to be charge shuffled
between
two frequencies, and almost the entire field to be charge shuffled
between
three.
There is little reason to
prefer the TEK over the LL device for
Red TTF use. For Taurus use with Blue TTF, however, the TEK device may
be preferable.
RGO Spectrograph
MITLL3 has been used with RGO
in the past. Taurus is now decommissioned for use on the AAT. This
information is provided for historical completeness only.
Contact
Chris
Tinney.
The MITLL3 device has been used on
RGO spectrograph's 25cm camera. RGO
users get smaller pixels than the TEK (15um vs 24um), together with a
much
increased wavelength coverage. Observers can either use smaller slits,
or get better sampling of sky lines. Once again vignetting stops the
whole
chip from being used, with only about 3000 pixels being illuminated by
the RGO - which is still more than double the wavelength range covered
by the TEK1K. You can play with the possible options using the WWW
version
of RGOANG.
Once again only observers looking
at wavelengths longer than 5000A should
consider using the LL device, while those observing in the UV may
prefer
the TEK. Observers of single objects with the LL can achieve quite
short
exposure times by windowing out the largely useless spatial direction.
4.
Serial Links and Possible Problems with data 18 Oct 1997 - 14 Feb
1998
During initial testing of the
MITLL2 CCD at Epping, it was realised
that the limitation to readout speed of this device was the speed of
the
Serial Data Link between the CCD Controller and the Large External
Memory.
A modification of the Epping Serial Data Link was undertaken to
increase
this speed. This included increasing the link clock rate from 20 MHz to
25
MHz, and decreasing the number of bits transmitted from 32 to 16. These
modifications permitted use of the MITLL2 "Normal" and "Fast" readout
modes.
(The link however was still not fast enough to cope with "Non-astro" ).
This link was sent to Site and
placed in regular use for the MITLL2 from
16 October 1997. On 20 January 98, the three Serial Data links at
Site
were modified to allow them to be used with the MITLL2 CCD. During
testing
of these modifications, it was noted (by John Sullivan) that one link
was
generating errors (i.e. the link error signal was causing the Error
status
LED to come on). Further tests revealed that all links (including the
Epping
link) were generating errors, at a very low rate.
In order to assess how many errors
the links were generating, a tests
have been carried out of the speeded-up links between the AAT Vaccum
Lab
and the Control Room. A 1100 x 1090 = 1199000 pixel window was used.
|
Run
|
Total errors (out of 1199000 pixels)
|
|
1
|
8
|
|
2
|
9
|
|
3
|
9
|
|
4
|
15
|
|
5
|
10
|
|
6
|
8
|
|
7
|
12
|
|
8
|
11
|
|
9
|
11
|
|
10
|
11
|
|
Average
|
10
|
It should be noted
that the type of "errors" occuring have
not yet been quantified. The link error indicator can be generated as a
result
of a number of reasons, including an actual data parity error.
Unforunately,
to determine the type of error would require significant modifications
to
the circuitry. It has not been possible so far to determine if any of
these
errors are actual data errors. There have certainly been no reports of
"suspect"
data, and it is felt with confidence that there are no data errors
occuring
which result in values of either 65535 or 0.
A fix implemented on 14 February
1998 by Darren Stafford, resulted in
this problem being cured. It no longer affects any observations
(except
for use
of the NONASTRO mode of the MITLL2 CCD using the old copper cable
serial cards, which are no longer supported).
Summary
All observations taken with the
MITLL2 CCD prior to 14 Feb 1998,
and all observations made with all CCDs between 10 Jan 1998 and 14 Feb
1998
are potentially subject to these errors. However, the error rate is
small
(10 per 1 million pixels) and does not appear to produce any noticeable
effect
on data (certainly it was never noticed by observers prior to the John
Sullivan's
discovery of the problem). We do not beleive it to be a serious
concern,
but wish to make observers aware of what we have found.
Should any observers, during
analysis, find any problem with their data
then we urge them to contact the Chris Tinney
(
cgt@aaoepp.aao.gov.au) at
the
AAO as soon as possible.