Results of allocating guide stars from the SDSS catalog to a WFMOS-type instrument. The tests focus mostly on how the allocation efficiency varies as the spine patrol radius is changed. A field with a low density (high galactic latitude) is used as this is likely to be representative of the worst-case scenario.
-
A guide-star target-list was prepared from the SDSS-DRv5 catalog using the VizieR web interface. A 4° diameter field with a high galactic latitude was chosen. Only good and acceptable stellar objects with a G, R & I magnitude < 20 were selected. This resulted in a preliminary target-list of 6867 objects.
-
A color-cut was performed on the target-list to select appropriate guide stars. (ie. avoid galaxies/asteroids/extended objects/etc in favour of well isolated stellar objects.) See diagram below:
-
A G-band magnitude cut was also performed to permit only a narrow ½-magnitude range of targets to be allocated (so the A&G camera will not saturate).
-
An appropriate Instrument Description File for a 28x28 12mm-separated grid of guide-spines was created for use with the Echidna spine-to-object allocation software. The layout of the spines, along with the 2° FOV and the entire color-cut catalog, can be seen in the diagram below:
All 5839 color-cut targets extracted from the SDSS catalog. The full target density (no additional magnitude cut) is ~464.7/°2.
In total, there are 784 guide spines. This large number is not meant to be representative of the likely number of guide spines in a WFMOS instrument, but rather to give an accurate statistical indication of the efficiency.
-
Technical details about how to extract data from VizieR, cut it & prepare a .fld file (for input into the spine-to-object allocation software) are at: $e/wfmos-a/doc/guide.star.catalog.txt.
Results
Target Density
The allocation efficiency is highly-dependant on the target density.
The diagram below shows the target density (over the full 4° field) in narrow ½-magnitude bands of our color-cut catalog:
Note: labels on X & Y axis are the wrong way around!
We have used the 15.0-15.5 magnitude band with the patrol-radius tests.
Allocation efficiency vs patrol radius
The data/diagram below shows how the allocation efficiency varies as a function of the patrol radius of the guide spines.
The 15.0-15.5 magnitude cut gives a target density of: 164/4π = 13.1/°2
Spine patrol radius (mm) |
Number of allocated targets |
Percentage of guide spines allocated |
| 1.0 | 1 | 0.1 |
| 2.0 | 5 | 0.6 |
| 3.0 | 13 | 1.6 |
| 4.0 | 17 | 2.1 |
| 5.0 | 28 | 3.5 |
| 6.0 | 42 | 5.3 |
| 7.0 | 49 | 6.2 |
| 8.0 | 53 | 6.7 |
| 9.0 | 53 | 6.7 |
| 10.0 | 55 | 7.0 |
|
|
An example allocation:
6mm patrol radius with a magnitude cut of: 15.0 - 15.5